Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:11:43 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ Message-ID: <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <CAF6rxgk9UJRk07SXfLzK97ZaTO0aTsoUQ9-06UzdnGV4JHL4ug@mail.gmail.com> <50AA8C85.2000002@netfence.it> <176051353355653@web21f.yandex.ru> <CAF6rxgmdXoNp%2Bnj0-H8bUSw=7KsRw5cZaMxyzK4bMdHH=%2BMLcA@mail.gmail.com> <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/07/12 21:36, Jakub Lach wrote: > While it's very, very minute detail, I think that in #officesuite > there should be "Apache OpenOffice" not "Apache Open Office" > as they were very careful even bureaucratic [*] if I reckon correctly, > when choosing new branding. > > [*] They have "branding initiative guidelines" and held vote- > https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_org_is_now_apache Hi Jakub You can file a patch for it Index: en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml =================================================================== --- en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml (revision 40304) +++ en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml (working copy) @@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ <answer> <para>The open-source <application><ulink - url="http://www.openoffice.org">Apache Open Office</ulink></application> + url="http://www.openoffice.org">Apache OpenOffice</ulink></application> and <application><ulink url="http://www.libreoffice.org">LibreOffice</ulink></application>; office suites work natively on &os;.</para>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50C25B8F.2010605>