Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:28:49 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] zfs root pool mounting Message-ID: <50D6F901.7050206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50B6598B.20200@FreeBSD.org> References: <50B6598B.20200@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have MFCed the following change, so please double-check if you might be affected. Preferably before upgrading :-) on 28/11/2012 20:35 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root filesystem > mounting. Previously the root pool had to be present in zpool.cache. Now it is > automatically discovered by probing available GEOM providers. > The new scheme is believed to be more flexible. For example, it allows to prepare > a new root pool at one system, then export it and then boot from it on a new > system without doing any extra/magical steps with zpool.cache. It could also be > convenient after zpool split and in some other situations. > > The change was introduced via multiple commits, the latest relevant revision in > head is r243502. The changes are partially MFC-ed, the remaining parts are > scheduled to be MFC-ed soon. > > I have received a report that the change caused a problem with booting on at least > one system. The problem has been identified as an issue in local environment and > has been fixed. Please read on to see if you might be affected when you upgrade, > so that you can avoid any unnecessary surprises. > > You might be affected if you ever had a pool named the same as your current root > pool. And you still have any disks connected to your system that belonged to that > pool (in whole or via some partitions). And that pool was never properly > destroyed using zpool destroy, but merely abandoned (its disks > re-purposed/re-partitioned/reused). > > If all of the above are true, then I recommend that you run 'zdb -l <disk>' for > all suspect disks and their partitions (or just all disks and partitions). If > this command reports at least one valid ZFS label for a disk or a partition that > do not belong to any current pool, then the problem may affect you. > > The best course is to remove the offending labels. > > If you are affected, please follow up to this email. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50D6F901.7050206>