Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:02:11 +0100
From:      Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <50E45A03.9080600@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130102123148.1f493d00@X220.ovitrap.com>
References:  <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <CADLo83-RtuRE58HORn8ocqRVtcF3ZANJoHh1D8TO=aucwywbQw@mail.gmail.com> <f7a783bba9425aeaf67d94056b49f272.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <148920333.20121231235441@takeda.tk> <CAF6rxgk62bugOyUz0BFTpk_H6c30ohF0n6p79Q%2B5hZwNB3QcjQ@mail.gmail.com> <50E3444D.1060307@mu.org> <CAF6rxgnme9kdocet3UzXYas6MMDP1rKTJjdDo_AULvs-LM2pCQ@mail.gmail.com> <6794891ed487f426d2c5d0108648f1e0.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20130102123148.1f493d00@X220.ovitrap.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 02.01.2013 06:31, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
> Hi,
> 
>> Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
>> CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for
>> GIT, just seems a bit masochistic.
> 
> do not worry. It will come.
> 
> Seriously, I do not understand many changes especially when there is a
> system in place which does not affect a running system at all but
> things inside the OS still could be improved. 

The migration was made in order to get "things inside the OS ...
improved" at all.  Developers were fed up wasting too much time
struggling with CVS itself rather than working on "the things inside the
OS".




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50E45A03.9080600>