Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:46:25 -0800 From: "Thomas D. Dean" <tomdean@speakeasy.org> Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: time_t definition Message-ID: <50F8D3A1.6090104@speakeasy.org> In-Reply-To: <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <50F5A189.7000701@speakeasy.org> <20130116120015.3b8d0db4@mr129166> <50F6EDFB.70501@speakeasy.org> <CAHu1Y71L0fuQPgN044-GDr8NBPAo=n%2B6HSBv7Zi%2ByXTceYTZCA@mail.gmail.com> <20130117011721.69799ef6.freebsd@edvax.de> <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 01/17/13 06:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > A lot of discussion about what I can do other than understand why gcc does not keep track of the basic typedef. Mayhe the question is beyond this list. Thanks for the replies. Tom Deanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50F8D3A1.6090104>