Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:11:16 -0800 From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> To: Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com> Cc: d@delphij.net, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: futimens(2) and utimensat(2) Message-ID: <50FB6E64.6060203@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20130119145929.GA23230@dchagin.static.corbina.net> References: <4F4DC876.3010809@delphij.net> <20130119145929.GA23230@dchagin.static.corbina.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 1/19/13 6:59 AM, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:40:54PM -0800, Xin Li wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi, >> >> These are required by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008. Patchset at: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/for_review/utimens.diff >> >> Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> >> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free >> or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 >> (FreeBSD) > > > Hi Xin, Do you plan to commit this? I'm not working on this recently, and as Jilles already pointed out, it needs to be improved or rewritten to make sure that its standard conformance. Do you plan to work on this or just asking? If you have time and plan to do it, be my guest. Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ+25kAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuz94cH/jpNvWpd5aLWgkx3yA1m7yGj jWOQadYV58TK6JIQn+gLd6mEU8IXOu74gBLCpQqdL4U9NiU4PhZ5sTfKXwDR7A2w uZUlQle2cfWLXKBVQI5vsHT0gdGyQ1HHtUFeIA6adSSKSpsM1JOmxMTU4e/f2tPQ s9CEdHcBEnSTLfhsFkoFO58N1sgLvFRGzh6EUWkAt9I8q5IW7enaZnI7sLdwRVkk IoOkKs35Sm7rag+IaJoegSxOs0w9WUZJLtoBPyKHFIihImt+6hBHNmIx7+Nz4Eih P4lwMU7wT/MobQxWeyN0dgZoA8Mj3VnjE972D2cllkeo7DfuYqE7jFEsaS08O2k= =WhU0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50FB6E64.6060203>