Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:25:09 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Steve Reid <sreid@sea-to-sky.net> Cc: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee>, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XF86-4, Linux binaries, DRI? Message-ID: <51028.975345909@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Steve Reid <sreid@sea-to-sky.net> of "Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:59:15 PST." <20001126205915.A40068@grok>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> - With the "normal" graphics setting, my new config (G450/DRI) is > lots slower than my old config (G200/Utah). It's okay at other settings > (vertex lighting & low geometric detail), but the graphics seem jerky > even when the on-screen FPS counter (/cg_drawfps 1) shows over 80 fps. This appears to be an artifact of the degree to which Utah-glx is 'tuned' for the Matrox card. Using a benchmark of a standard G400 with both XFree86 3.3.6 + Utah and XFree86 4.0.1 + DRI + AGP (preloading all the requisite modules), it's a sad fact that 4.0.1 is less than half the speed using all the various xlock/glclock/glracer type benchmarks. I'm sticking with 3.3.6 for now. ;) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51028.975345909>