Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:25:41 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing default build of gcc Message-ID: <510295E5.8060400@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71@FreeBSD.org> References: <74D8E686-3679-46F2-8A08-4CF5DFC020CA@FreeBSD.org> <20130125113122.GN2522@kib.kiev.ua> <1B345827-76F0-49C7-8D54-82866938E0A1@theravensnest.org> <510290A1.5010809@FreeBSD.org> <44ED3C73-4BC0-4EFE-9072-474E6FE32B71@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 25/01/2013 16:10 David Chisnall said the following: > On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following: >>> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at >>> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised. >> >> A simple test - has there been a core decision that no GPL software must be >> shipped with 10.x? > > There can be no such decision until it's all of the bits of GPL'd code in base > have replacements in and testing has happened. I disagree. Core can make a decision to set a goal. > That is why it is a plan, not > an accomplished goal. Right. The question is - is this a plan set by Core, and so a Project's Plan, or is this a plan that individual project members have set for themselves? As long as there are no conflicts in plans or objections to the plan the distinction is insignificant, but not longer. > This is why we have the wiki page tracking the progress > of replacements: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/GPLinBase OK. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?510295E5.8060400>