Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:14:03 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout Message-ID: <51383E3B.5030007@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130307062335.GB1478@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20130225082042.GB1426@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <512CF97B.8030805@norma.perm.ru> <20130227020123.GA3581@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <512DE968.4020409@quip.cz> <20130228053558.GA1474@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <5136D89D.4000902@norma.perm.ru> <20130306062658.GC1483@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <513713C2.1000007@norma.perm.ru> <20130307022446.GB3108@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <513820E2.806@norma.perm.ru> <20130307062335.GB1478@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. On 07.03.2013 12:23, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:08:50AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: >> It was definitely older than "months". It was running something similar >> to "FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Sep 19 08:10:00 YEKST 2011", this is the >> uname from a neighbor machine. >> >> I have, as I said, identical servers running FreeBSD. Here are some of >> the unames that I don't see timeouts on: >> >> 8.3-STABLE #2: Wed Aug 29 13:00:02 YEKT 2012 (up 187 days) >> 8.3-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Mar 29 16:14:11 MSK 2012 (up 15 days, previous >> uptime around 180 days) > These servers do not have 5718/5719/5720 changes. > >> 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed Dec 14 16:56:11 YEKT 2011 (up 99 days) > This server has the bge(4) change but it didn't trigger watchdog > timeouts. Does this server use the same controller? If yes, the > issue didn't come from bge(4) change. > How's that ? It's running even older version than previous two. I guess you misread the year. Eugene.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51383E3B.5030007>