Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:31:19 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly? Message-ID: <51388897.4080102@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2PXQTJXQFJNRWAHLPOLDP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput. Are there any plans for FreeBSD "native" packet filter IPFW2 to gain the same? Or, to ask it differently, IS ipfw(1), the freeBSD native packetfilter, already SMP friendly and so better suited for multicore architectures? I'm just cyrious. regards, Oliver ------enig2PXQTJXQFJNRWAHLPOLDP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJROIiXAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N80p0H/ApHsW6MrHEcAtUXdueR5ytq 7RsB84W/cEPYZOhQwmg/jQn99gN1/IKjDuMbXbdj0t7+ady9bSNC2nM+2U15V3di Z8l78ra1hKI8xkLlV7QdDgxAmrG2dzS32GYcfgS/+DO+fLjJ3BCIXEhsy2GR0YCg KRTykPzo2GPK5G++MDpvMzI/7Hljo8YzPQpWW1+Gn7OB17ua6qVpI5cSai9cIhHC pzpIGbtZLDUy7bgispRkYJ0YbwGkjGiwCsD4iCEzX8Qk02W9nUqF3j0VNwIXEXF7 PNDB4KhYoCWViQPzdmS2M5j6+SWi7jYcoK+b3a429/buUGvK/ym20kcsEUsotPs= =NBKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2PXQTJXQFJNRWAHLPOLDP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51388897.4080102>