Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> To: sib@tormail.org Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique Message-ID: <5148980A.1070408@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <1UHfYF-000LVV-4Y@internal.tormail.org> References: <1UHfYF-000LVV-4Y@internal.tormail.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18.03.13 20:16, sib@tormail.org wrote: > to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much better > solution. I also see that you are the maintainer/author of qjail and like > to shovel your opinion as the only solution, both in this "rewrite" and > all over the FreeBSD forums. Taking a look at the qjail code I can not help to notice several odd similarities with the ezjail-admin script, down to the very basic bail out routines. I would not go so far to claim it was just a global search/replace job but to me the code looks familiar enough to find the # Copyright 2010, Qjail project. All rights reserved. offensive. I am usually quite open with the license of my software, beerware is as permissive as it gets. I just can not take some script kiddie right out copying my code verbatim and selling it as his, not even acknowledging me as the original author. Anyone here with suggestions how to properly react to this kind of "fork"? erdgeist
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5148980A.1070408>