Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:34:24 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add LINUX_OSRELEASE to bsd.linux-rpm.mk Message-ID: <51494351@bs1.sp34.ru> In-Reply-To: <18418.26253.180946.712309@gromit.timing.com> (John E. Hein's message of "Tue\, 1 Apr 2008 10\:45\:01 -0600") References: <07011489@ipt.ru> <20080321115227.zkcrs6rvc4c8s004@webmail.leidinger.net> <98037310@ipt.ru> <20080322085434.10838040@deskjail> <62336383@ipt.ru> <62213004@bs1.sp34.ru> <18418.26253.180946.712309@gromit.timing.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:45:01 -0600 John E Hein wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote at 20:42 +0400 on Apr 1, 2008: > > Seems that I have change my mind since linux-rpm.mk is too tied to rpm > > format and dealing with it. The file can't be (easily) used with an > > average linux port. I tried to convert to using linux-rpm.mk acroread7 > > port. I got a mess. :-( > > > > Well, what about new bsd.linux-apps.rpm? > Ermm... typo? Change that to 'bsd.linux-apps.mk' and it sounds > good to me ;) Sure, it was a typo. ;-) > I've always disliked specifying the package file format in the linux > .mk file name. The thing is that linux-rpm.mk will stay and a new one should be introduced for other purpose (i.e. to decide when to use different linux infrastructure ports). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51494351>