Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:04:31 -0700 From: Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf performance? Message-ID: <51797E3F.1030400@soe.ucsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom9AcEGKYHNDBkJ_yUo4%2BbMrbxfbLBV6HrUD2UW_0_crw@mail.gmail.com> References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu> <201304240134.22740.vegeta@tuxpowered.net> <517974DA.5090809@soe.ucsc.edu> <CAJ-Vmom9AcEGKYHNDBkJ_yUo4%2BbMrbxfbLBV6HrUD2UW_0_crw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> ... please ask the pfsense guys to either migrate to -9, or backport > the -head pf (with the locking fixes!) to -8 for that. > > Otherwise you're very likely going to be wasting time on something you > can't really push that much harder. I can ask for that (and will soon, likely), but to play with my current setup in the meantime, can we logically say that if I have 4 cores, and one interrupt queue is assigned to each core, and under I load I see each core (via "top -P") at 100% in interrupt usage, would it be safe to say that more cores (with additional interrupt queues accordingly) would mean more interrupts overall being processed, which would mean more pps?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51797E3F.1030400>