Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 20:11:42 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Migrating the documentation to a real XML toolchain Message-ID: <518E89DE.70008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130508122821.GA1521@emphyrio.blackend.org> References: <512D2F9C.8080403@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1302261759420.49330@wonkity.com> <5142357A.9070301@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303141642470.84119@wonkity.com> <5142D0C9.70905@FreeBSD.org> <20130508122821.GA1521@emphyrio.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 08-05-2013 14:28, Marc Fonvieille escreveu: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:42:01AM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>> > > >>> > >Good question. I know this is given as a reason why acronyms should >>> > >always be marked up, and I thought I'd seen it at some point in the >>> > >FreeBSD docs. But it does not do it now, and I may have been looking >>> > >at something else. It is something that would really benefit the reader. >> >I also agree that it would be a nice feature but actually I don't even >> >understand how it is supposed to work at the moment. In most cases, the >> >markup does not hold the expansion, it just says e.g. >> ><acronym>NFS</acronym> but does not include what it needs to expand to. >> >We could add an attribute but then it would only appear if the attribute >> >is present. Shall we expand all occurrences (would mean lots of >> >redundancy) or just the first? > It was supposed working in the same way as the trademarks, i.e., the 1st > occurence is expanded/rendered. > I just don't where the expanded text is taken from. I cannot find it in our markup. I googled about it and I see very different pieces of information. I'll look at it better when the current changeset is merged back. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518E89DE.70008>