Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:25:05 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap Message-ID: <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281057160.9642@wonkity.com> <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013.07.28. 21:17, Warren Block wrote: >> This seems to does the XSLT-part, although it may be done in a better >> way since it breaks some DocBook features that we don't use: >> http://kovesdan.org/patches/xhtml-wrap.diff > > Nice! Which DocBook features would be compromised? Are there any > other reasons not to start using this now? Line numbering and syntax highlighting. Both require XSLT extensions and thus won't work with xsltproc. I don't know of any other reason not to use them. I think we should only use the indicator at the end of the line both not at the start of the wrapped part since this is more conventional. And it would be nice to use the same symbol that we use in the new PDFs. That is part of the Droid Sans Mono font. This example uses images but maybe it is possible to use text, I'm not sure about this, I don't know CSS so well. Anyway, we may as well create an image with an SVG editor. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51F57011.2000603>