Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:12:50 +0930 From: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> To: "Zyumbilev, Peter" <peter@aboutsupport.com> Cc: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 lines Message-ID: <51F76E7A.40504@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <51F7505B.3090200@aboutsupport.com> References: <51F66820.4080907@aboutsupport.com> <51F668E2.4090806@aboutsupport.com> <1375105599.9477.2811311.2C84EDDD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <51F69A9F.3050800@aboutsupport.com> <51F6A128.6060903@FreeBSD.org> <51F7505B.3090200@aboutsupport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/07/2013 15:04, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: > However really not sure what is the best way - the only feasible > solution I found so far is DNS faiolver > http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/services/dns-failover-system-monitoring/. > However I am not 100% sure how well it will work and if this may cause > more troubles and embarrassment in front of the customer than simply > giving them in a email > > gate1.example.com(primary) > gate2.example.com(backup) I thought pfsense supported failover - or is that limited to outgoing? http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/File:RouterDiagram.png http://www.techvilleottawa.org/pfsense-load-balance-fail-over-setup/ Otherwise something like wackamole or heartbeat to keep the ip address alive?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51F76E7A.40504>