Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:21:22 +0100 From: Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/181388: [route] Routes not updated on mtu change Message-ID: <52137B62.3000405@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <162512031.20130820124633@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <201308190700.r7J701I9045665@freefall.freebsd.org> <5211D812.5070308@rewt.org.uk> <20130820011254.GZ94127@funkthat.com> <521327EB.6010407@rewt.org.uk> <162512031.20130820124633@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/08/2013 09:46, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Joe. > You wrote 20 августа 2013 г., 12:25:15: > > JH> vlan interfaces achieve the same thing without having to mess about with > JH> mtus on routes and also give you an interface to work with, a much nicer > JH> method comparatively. > But it could put huge load on routing between these two segments and/or > requires managed switches. > Neither really, don't need a managed switch to use dot1q and if you're routing between segments with a box, then you shouldn't be using multiple ranges in the same broadcast domain anyway. Networking 101
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52137B62.3000405>