Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:09:10 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Subject: Re: route/arp lifetime (Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)) Message-ID: <5218E8B6.5090407@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon9qhnn_xJkiKZnLWEi-YAvg=FuL8FoSdToWXgy-VJ59Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <520A6D07.5080106@freebsd.org> <520B74DD.1060102@ipfw.ru> <20130814124024.GA64548@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <201308141740.28779.zec@fer.hr> <20130814154853.GA66341@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <521204A9.7080607@ipfw.ru> <52152837.9010101@freebsd.org> <5218ABB4.5070601@ipfw.ru> <CAJ-Vmon9qhnn_xJkiKZnLWEi-YAvg=FuL8FoSdToWXgy-VJ59Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.08.2013 19:04, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I'm very close to starting an mbuf batching thing to use in a few places like receive, transmit and > transmit completion -> free path. I'd be interested in your review/feedback and testing as it sounds > like something you can easily stress test there. :) I'd strongly recommend fixing a number of other places and collect lower hanging fruit before starting with mbuf batching. -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5218E8B6.5090407>