Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:51:40 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Message-ID: <5283CA3C.3080201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNxk25AJ3TMuceSG=EmL3qSE9Xhk_wpL5pAD8YvZrA6gkg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20131112163219.GA2834@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <77CB2B92-216A-4C80-B033-7E582B5F0DFC@FreeBSD.org> <20131112165422.GA2939@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <E0FE40D9-726C-4501-B31A-3622510C1C68@FreeBSD.org> <20131112175556.GA3319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131112201922.GA4330@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131113173143.Horde.a-9M7JQ_vHo3tpDIMsGK6g1@webmail.df.eu> <CAFMmRNxk25AJ3TMuceSG=EmL3qSE9Xhk_wpL5pAD8YvZrA6gkg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 13/11/2013 19:52 Ryan Stone said the following: > In my experience libstdc++ does not have good ABI stability between versions In my experience it does. In either case compatibility between different versions of relatively modern libstdc++ version is no doubt much better than between libstdc++ and libc++. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5283CA3C.3080201>