Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:13:31 -0500 From: George Rosamond <george@ceetonetechnology.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TMPFS in kernels Message-ID: <5314016B.1000107@ceetonetechnology.com> In-Reply-To: <1393818974.1149.270.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <5313D0FE.8010008@ceetonetechnology.com> <1393818974.1149.270.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Lepore: > On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 19:46 -0500, George Rosamond wrote: >> Is there a reason why TMPFS(5) is not in the 10-Stable's ALIX and RPI-B >> kernels, yet in BEAGLEBONE? Haven't checked the others. >> >> Seems like a strong and mature replacement for md(4) from my >> experiences, and probably belongs in the Crochet fstabs. I have been >> using on Alix, RPis, x86 for a long while, and never had any >> (noticeable) issues. >> >> g > > I agree. Should we add it to all configs, or just to armv6 configs? > I'd assume we should have it all the kernels.. especially since most of them are running off flash-type media, which makes memory-based disks pretty vital. g
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5314016B.1000107>