Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:09:25 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Trying to upgrade from 9.3-Stable to 10.1-Stable Message-ID: <547F7C05.10404@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <1417620100.1064.72.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <547EFE22.6050801@digiware.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412030817150.84718@wonkity.com> <1417620100.1064.72.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3-12-2014 16:21, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 08:18 -0700, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> >>> Trying to compile world for upgrading I run into: >>> (single threaded make) >>> >>> ===> lib/clang/libclanganalysis (depend) >>> clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-list -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d AttrList.inc.d -o AttrList.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-classes -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d Attrs.inc.d -o Attrs.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> Stack dump: >>> 0. Program arguments: clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-classes -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d Attrs.inc.d -o Attrs.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> *** Signal 11 >>> >>> Is this because the 9.3 toolchain doesn't like 10.1...?? >>> >>> Upgrade is on a atom running: >>> 9.3-STABLE FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #56 r269952: Thu Aug 14 07:00:37 CEST 2014 >> >> 'make toolchain' can help before trying a buildworld for a different >> major version. > > toolchain is one of the early steps run during buildworld, invoking it > separately shouldn't make any difference. > > This looks like it ran out of memory... check syslog or dmesg, see if > you have some "process killed; out of swap space" messages. Building > clang needs a ton of memory. This is what dmesg says: pid 251 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 252 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 253 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 25518 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) System has 4Gb of mem. No complaints about out of swap. There is 4Gb of swap reserved. Perhaps I should go the royal way, and go for 10.0 as intermediate step? --WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?547F7C05.10404>