Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:15:14 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: "ports@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: I do not quite understand why a BIND upgrade needs to touch soo much. Message-ID: <548F4F62.4020308@digiware.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
I'm trying get going in the new flow of pkg and poudriere.
So I'm building my packages with poudriere and using pkg (1.4.0)
to upgrade bind. With the sort of shocking result:
======================
Installed packages to be REMOVED:
gettext-0.18.3.1_1
elm-2.5.8_2
libexif-0.6.21
neon29-0.29.6_4
rrdtool-1.4.8_4
glib~pkg-renamed~E6E1-2.36.3_4
LPRng-3.8.C_2,1
gnome-mime-data-2.18.0_4
libzvbi-0.2.34
vcdimager-0.7.24_1
flex-2.5.37_1
bison-2.7.1,1
gnutls-3.2.19_1
git-2.1.2
texi2html-5.0_1,1
p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3
help2man-1.43.3_1
yasm-1.2.0
binutils-2.24_1
gmake-4.1
sudo-1.8.11.p1
New packages to be INSTALLED:
gettext-runtime: 0.19.3
glib: 2.42.1
docbook: 1.5
pinentry: 0.9.0
npth: 1.1
Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
bind99: 9.9.6 -> 9.9.6P1
gtk-update-icon-cache: 2.24.22 -> 2.24.25
gtk2: 2.24.22_4 -> 2.24.25_1
pango: 1.34.1_7 -> 1.36.8
python27: 2.7.8_5 -> 2.7.8_6
gobject-introspection: 1.36.0_3 -> 1.42.0
gdk-pixbuf2: 2.28.2_1 -> 2.31.2
gconf2: 2.32.0_6 -> 3.2.6_2
dconf: 0.14.1_1 -> 0.22.0
atk: 2.8.0_1 -> 2.14.0
gnupg: 2.0.26_1 -> 2.1.0_1
bash: 4.3.30 -> 4.3.30_1
getopt: 1.1.5 -> 1.1.6
Installed packages to be REINSTALLED:
subversion-1.8.10_3 (options changed)
gdbm-1.11_2 (options changed)
popt-1.16_1 (direct dependency changed)
gstreamer-plugins-0.10.36_4,3 (direct dependency changed)
libIDL-0.8.14_2 (direct dependency changed)
ORBit2-2.14.19_1 (direct dependency changed)
polkit-0.105_3 (direct dependency changed)
dbus-glib-0.100.2_1 (direct dependency changed)
shared-mime-info-1.1_1 (direct dependency changed)
libidn-1.29 (options changed)
libgpg-error-1.17 (options changed)
The operation will free 112 MB.
23 MB to be downloaded.
======================
I can "respect" the fact that some things need to be upgraded as a
side-effect, eg. ue to lib upgrades.
But why reinstall subversion which for me as user is an edge package
(nothing depends on it), and not reinstall rrdtools, which has other
dependancies (cacti).
So just going 'yes' by default leaves me with broken packages.
Or having to capture the list of removed packages and start adding that
by hand. Which in the end sort of boils down into doing full-fledged
'pkg upgrade', and giving me all new packages, with lots of
possibilities of broken services due to the upgrades. Requiring me to
checkout all services and stuff that I have on this server.
As an alternative
portupgrade bind99
does the job with minimal invasive surgery.
But then I'm back to maintaining every package on every server just by
itself.
--WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?548F4F62.4020308>