Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:20:26 +0200 From: Alexandr Krivulya <shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, Andrew Wilcox <AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com>, 'freebsd-current' <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: drm2 regression: backlight adjustment on ivybridge no longer works Message-ID: <54CDFDEA.2010209@shurik.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20150201101201.GP41565@e-new.0x20.net> References: <CACyC=qZeG8L%2BbZu=RacU_rdNVTFhyCFH2A%2BdNw71%2B09cZ20VgA@mail.gmail.com> <009501d03acb$4f380d70$eda82850$@Wilcox-Tech.com> <CAJ-Vmokph=BHH895uHxQh=dHPfb5_ik4MZrq8sOGrd0AtPzymQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom3gLa_2EoviL0Ck2B36Bpa-3P58%2BUp5rsLFaH-NS4ExQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACyC=qZJZw0DNWO%2BUd_pq_4V4d4A6yMnDF%2BwVqPgt1mg1txJWg@mail.gmail.com> <54CA7949.6060202@shurik.kiev.ua> <CADGo8CVuDLVUD26Xfr1j=nEQ%2B5q4ByfYC8EK4XYTm=sNvab3pA@mail.gmail.com> <20150201091821.GN41565@e-new.0x20.net> <004001d03e02$62d7f040$2887d0c0$@Wilcox-Tech.com> <20150201094124.GO41565@e-new.0x20.net> <20150201101201.GP41565@e-new.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
01.02.2015 12:12, Lars Engels пишет: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lars Engels wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:35:15AM -0600, Andrew Wilcox wrote: >>> Lars Engels sent: 01 February 2015 03:18: >>>> With acpi_video I get some interesting sysctl: >>>> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.levels: 100 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >>>> 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >>>> 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 >>>> 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >>>> 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 >>>> >>>> I guess it should not be 100 100 0 ... 100? >>> Actually, the "standard" internal ACPI brightness level struct (BRTN in the DSDT) is laid out as: >>> >>> * "Full power" value (one byte, the value at which the brightness should be set on AC by default) >>> * "Economy" value (one byte, the value at which the brightness should be set on battery by default) >>> * Actual values (N bytes, up to Max but frequently not) >>> >>> So, no, that value indeed sounds correct. On my laptop the value is: >>> 80 47 0 7 13 20 27 33 40 47 53 60 67 73 80 87 93 100 >> Thank you for the explanation. >> FWIW, here is the full output from sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0: >> >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 11 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.fullpower: 100 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.economy: 100 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.levels: 100 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >> 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >> 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 >> 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >> 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 >> hw.acpi.video.crt0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext1.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext2.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext3.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext4.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext5.active: 1 >> >>> What revision of -CURRENT are you running? What is the outcome of >>> trying the patch posted Saturday morning (UTC) from Elizabeth Myers >>> (message ID <54CC5311.9070604@interlinked.me>)? >>> >> I'm currently running r277858 and haven't tried the patch, yet. But will >> do now and report back. >> > So now I have a new sysctl hw.dri.0.i915_backlight. But no matter what > value I pass to it, the brightness doesn't change. > > It's a Ivy Brigde notebook where drm shows some errors in dmesg. Please > see: http://pastie.org/9877917 > > Please try to boot with acpi_ibm and without acpi_video. This way all works for me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54CDFDEA.2010209>