Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:46:26 -0400 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD recommends not using base unbound for an authoritative server Message-ID: <5508CAE2.4060300@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20150317192847.5b39d1c8@lapsdeb> References: <CAPi0pssPrcJgF71AvQ-M1RZt=%2Btv=6FTGtwhi9_bX6-Q-7b7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150317192847.5b39d1c8@lapsdeb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/17/15 19:28, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:25:09 -0700 > Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> wrote: >> For the same reasons, I'd like to run the base system's unbound to >> authoritatively host my DNS... but FreeBSD is discouraging me in >> section 29.7.2 of the manual. Why the discouragement? > Unbound is only a validating caching resolver. It *can't* be > authoritative. I am using unbound as an authoritative DNS resolver for my home network, it also is the caching resolver. It runs on a raspberry pi under FreeBSD 11.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5508CAE2.4060300>