Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:55:59 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ? 
Message-ID:  <55790.1086796559@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:16:30 %2B0200." <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:

>The change proposed is more or less to do:
>	s/dev_t/struct cdev */
>	s/udev_t/dev_t/
>over all the kernel sources (366 files or so).

Looks like a "yea" so far, so I have a couple of follow-up questions:

	struct cdev currently has members named si_* because it
	used to be called "specinfo", do we want to change that
	inconsistency at the same time ? (either by reverting to
	the specinfo name or by changing to a cd_ prefix ?

	cdevsw->ioctl() takes a caddr_t pointer argument which
	really should be a void *, do we want to change that
	as well (since it is all the same files we'll have to
	change).

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55790.1086796559>