Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:29:09 -0400 From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Storage question Message-ID: <55F10715.3040508@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <55F105B2.2080806@sneakertech.com> References: <55EF3D23.5060009@hiwaay.net> <20150908220639.20412cbd@gumby.homeunix.com> <55EF5409.8020007@yahoo.com> <55EFC2DA.3020101@hiwaay.net> <5EB5C2C2-575B-40BD-BF6A-85F396C058FE@kraus-haus.org> <55F058FC.6080204@hiwaay.net> <B737A47C-FECD-4882-9B57-DDF1B29FCDDF@kraus-haus.org> <55F09924.2000007@hiwaay.net> <67BE98EB-AD0F-46C2-AF26-02C65D828DCF@kraus-haus.org> <55F105B2.2080806@sneakertech.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>> Note also the “dnr” datasets :-) > > Btw, you seem to be going with the 'dummy dataset' method for preventing > fs fillup. What's the advantage of doing it this way vs refreservation > or any other method? More specifically, dummy datasets strike me as kind of the ugly way of handling this issue. Isn't it better to just set parameters on your real datasets?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55F10715.3040508>