Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:51:30 -0500 From: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <5644D1A2.6010305@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20151112174437.GJ48728@zxy.spb.ru> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5643B3EB.1040002@FreeBSD.org> <20151112000651.GH48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5644C937.6030103@freebsd.org> <20151112174437.GJ48728@zxy.spb.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2015-11-12 12:44, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2015-11-11 19:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>>>> I would also like to remove the NONE cipher >>>>> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in >>>>> base). >>>> >>>> Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no >>>> complaints. It was just reported and fixed upstream in the last day and >>>> I wrote in a similar fix in the port. That speaks a lot about its usage >>>> in the port currently. >>> >>> I am try using NPH/NONE with base ssh and confused: don't see >>> performance rise, too complex to enable and too complex for use. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> I did a few quick (and dirty) benchmarks and it shows that the NONE >> cipher definitely makes a difference. Version of OpenSSL also seems to >> make a difference, as one might expect. >> >> Note: openssh from ports seems to link against both base and ports >> libcrypto, I am still trying to make sure this isn't corrupting my >> benchmark results. >> >> I am still debugging my dummynet setup to be able to prove that HPN >> makes a difference (but it does). >> >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/SSHPerf > > I see you test NONE only on OpenSSH_7.1p1/1.0.2d. > I am try OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p (both side) > I am got about 500Mbit/s. > For OpenSSH_6.6.1p1/NONE I am got abot same. > > I am don't see this combination in you table (OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p ix0 OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p) > If NONE is actually being used, big warnings will be printed to your screen: WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER If you don't see this, NONE is not being used. -- Allan Jude [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWRNGlAAoJEBmVNT4SmAt+oz0P/AmIjPhryi2XE29u+yRjHvG1 zyfcRAplCOW78q6G4uNVim/m+sXu0zRC3qkL8nOIhsgTyOwKOB2FXFSYYGzSTAAy PE/32f9DoM1ZM93+PVYi/5SGWx1RxvWGyTxxRzIM925TneRScQ/roC0efO7+2ie2 6WQyUmGgvD6f++MjXj+vO0mUkGLUhqO5FRHXFtc+HZe9uzxZ1RIZ+w4uPuhwN+gi 4+HbZzakPQPaTZo9f/7foI4DZHr/GRMQ+1JQf8qQbrc4RiGucjf03KO0Kr2sn3fJ mckY0PKcFG2tPLtB0Fc9UdzqgTRnropacVr2omkCwYC+ZLzRo8gBw+lgNqv0F4CR 5cyErR9zbvMEfzJ8Zl/rcThF8hKdQ0M4g85ASerXRvK/YmX15C1j49cV/uR5rVi7 ZMtzr1DvnQYA+ul2gaaUpK6PC7E2gQM5EVIZwyKWX7ie+aHN9CPSu4+/lhoQKTqK f7K5pCpHWv7oMSbzYDXEs7N0cycGVsYFFmSNqOZ+V0kVpdIbUPwCBzvoeA+q1P7a 8CwoE8xd2UUq0f4FW5DcQcGxM2EPuQVN8/5nejhRdFaFLZ/UKmP3MVWvVvO7uEGh JpsNc+mTt/+8tJyLaHFD98lMDyDyH3MzT+PpLaZnqHli4q+Motx6i622vaqsnwuy kxh71YAGQCOBaftMSeEw =geei -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5644D1A2.6010305>