Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:03:15 +0100
From:      Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs
Message-ID:  <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu>
References:  <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are
> the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes:
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282

it is not blocking in a hard way.
But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again,
you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user
can change.
This could break in bad case the update process and the user has to
manually correct the UID/GUID of the repository stored on the system.

I think it is better to have a fixed UID/GUID for this really nice tool.

Or is that not correct?


Matthias

-- 

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
Rich Cook



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56C1E8B3.8090301>