Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 13:55:53 -0700 From: John Webster <jwebster0001@gmail.com> To: Mike Clarke <jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Preventing portmaster from using packages for specified ports Message-ID: <5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841@Sky.local> In-Reply-To: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
--On May 8, 2012 9:33:59 PM +0100 Mike Clarke <jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most
> of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port
> instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable
> GIMP plugin support in graphics/xsane
>
> Is there any way of forcing portmaster to never use packages for certain
> specified ports?
>
> --
Would this work for you? From the manpage:
For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always compiled
instead of being installed from packages the PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari-
able can be defined in the make(1) environment, perhaps in
/usr/local/etc/ports.conf if using /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portconf, or in
/etc/make.conf. This setting is not compatible with the
-PP/--packages-only option.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqYhiAAoJEFWEcdsJ/W2JTuYIAKAEyXpX1bA7KUFdRPjfD9XS
V5raKodYVOLX2EfzG2e2yOkux6WmvssCZr27evqQ0E9whYGOOw/coQ/oiM4wRmky
X0xeiMhOdeH7nAE/mVv3r7VUgTU63BII/TZ2GRBAgfTkEMzYZeTW1GMM0blfABLn
/zBH2g9omJEeOK1KDpwz/p/txyqcWL6DYnCO+OeUHKyEvJp4kXWuH5ch790Gzd/f
AdmIOJ/znohyGBsxQhAKjV7UPCx8H2tledlaDXrFn/MR3BKgF2JRLhaGmj/QpjSg
DPegYNLC1JsK9KTJjtdl/suTZxEf/d4pNODUqID/rob2fcoyPwLlxRlJZRBRnFs=
=g53X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841>
