Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:24:52 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>, "Oldach, Helge" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.0.20040424142123.07bf3db0@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <44658B20-9610-11D8-AAEB-000A95AD0668@errno.com> References: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CBB2@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com> <44658B20-9610-11D8-AAEB-000A95AD0668@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
>On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
>
>>Hi list,
>>
>>this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature compared
>>to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
>>committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
>
>The fix was not quite right for -current (where it needs to go in
>first). I sent out the attached patch for testing but received no
>feedback. Until I can get it tested and committed to -current it won't be
>MFC'd.
We dont run -current here, so I dont have anything to test it on. Also,
due to the bugs in the driver with HiFn 7955, we have had to abandon
FAST_IPSEC :(
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.3.0.0.20040424142123.07bf3db0>