Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:51:48 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MFC of the intr_event stuff Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.0.20060308114730.104f2ed0@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <200603081103.31669.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200603071502.46074.jhb@freebsd.org> <6.2.3.4.0.20060307192543.0531ae40@64.7.153.2> <6.2.3.4.0.20060307193549.071b9ef8@64.7.153.2> <200603081103.31669.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:03 AM 08/03/2006, John Baldwin wrote: >On Tuesday 07 March 2006 19:45, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 07:29 PM 07/03/2006, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >At 03:02 PM 07/03/2006, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>I have a somewhat large patch that MFC's some of the cleanups to the > > >>interrupt code that needs some testing before it is MFC'd. > > > > > > > > >It seems to help my sio overflows that are described in > > > > > > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51982 > > > > Actually, it only helps on the ICH box. On the VIA, I still need to > > make the change that Bruce Evans suggests > >The reason it might help is that if your sio(4) device shares its IRQ >with another driver, it would previously have been forced to use a >non-FAST handler, but now sio(4) can always use a FAST handler. Hi, Thanks for the info. Apart from manually patching, is there a better way to control for this ? ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.0.20060308114730.104f2ed0>