Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 19:25:30 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: Matthew Thyer <thyerm@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <6169.907867530@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Oct 1998 18:24:45 %2B0200." <xzpk92byqb6.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpk92byqb6.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: >> In message <xzpsogzys0f.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >> >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: >> > > In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes: >> > > > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed >> > > > from the base system ? >> > > Yes and no. >> > Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth >> > of Your Maginificence's explanation? >> Yes, it has been fixed. >> No, it hasn't been removed. > >The original question was "can tickadj be removed". You answered no. Sorry, misunderstanding there, yes I think it can be removed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6169.907867530>