Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:10:51 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Kristof Provost <kristof@sigsegv.be> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pf bug with tun interfaces ? Message-ID: <6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <AD6E6EB9-9FD8-4B9C-B401-2D750F17FA40@sigsegv.be> References: <1b605589-9642-ee92-fb9b-9ff5b4798316@sentex.net> <e1679f63-247c-1da6-8f57-30c5dd23304e@sentex.net> <AD6E6EB9-9FD8-4B9C-B401-2D750F17FA40@sigsegv.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/15/2017 4:28 AM, Kristof Provost wrote: > I don’t see any obvious reason why that would happen. > > Can you reduce this to a minimal test setup and include rc.conf, pf.conf, … > with a bug report in bugzilla? is it possible that its how OpenVPN sets up the tun interface ? Otherwise nat via pf on ppp connections would not work either. I will try and setup a most simple test vm ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6582cf37-08b0-9083-0c3e-1396a885d005>