Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:34:53 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pete@beforever.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> In-Reply-To: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050206132109.55669F-100000@fledge.watson.org> <8220c29b8ffacbd574cc9c26fe18d25b@bis.midco.net> <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Feb 6, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > The good points about FreeBSD obscurity are: > > CVSUP access > ftp download access > > If *everyone* used FreeBSD the above points would suck and I'd have to > move to a different OS. > > Your argument is flawed because there'd simply be that many more mirrors to choose from. Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something much more efficient. Pete...home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd>