Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:07:48 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenCVS Message-ID: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> In-Reply-To: <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold over what's currently available now. - Jordan On Dec 7, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: >> Hi hackers, >> >> I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] >> that >> should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance >> that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's >> version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it >> would help testing the code in another production environment. > > Have you verified that it does everything it needs to do, and works > correctly, in a FreeBSD environment? If not, that's step one. > > Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC>