Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:44:12 +0500 From: FuLLBLaSTstorm <fullblaststorm@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <6c51dbb10901150344s409cd834p3cd8fae189e42a68@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <496F0D1D.7080505@andric.com> References: <de2964020901141507m5a30c466ta1e05694d220ce0b@mail.gmail.com> <20090115084515.GA91157@freebsd.org> <496F0D1D.7080505@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-01-15 09:45, Roman Divacky wrote: > I really dont see any reason why there must be only ONE compiler that > can be used to compile FreeBSD. I fully agree with it, too. Why not to put something like OPTION_COMPILER=`gcc|clang|llvm' so every portion of system designed for particular compiler could use the right one?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6c51dbb10901150344s409cd834p3cd8fae189e42a68>