Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:20:09 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Recommended HBA for ZFS, contemporary Message-ID: <70B75F18-056B-49E5-9CDE-E8CCEA405CE8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <376FE1E5-42BD-4878-8441-DA912E4ECB5B@gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1608221904270.82304@woozle.rinet.ru> <306ccab3-4c78-751a-2258-54701a64ab4b@internetx.com> <41DE4DAA-B5E1-4BB9-AF54-780236A901EF@gmail.com> <059af3ed-71b3-b31d-893c-732121989cee@kateley.com> <633311CF-ADF2-479F-AFB9-E9265C101302@gmail.com> <376FE1E5-42BD-4878-8441-DA912E4ECB5B@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any feedback ? Many thanks ! Ben > On 13 Oct 2016, at 10:53, Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > What would you recommend for those who want a 12Gb/s SAS HBA ? > LSI 3008 ? > As reliable as LSI 2008 ? >=20 > Thank you ! >=20 > Ben >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 22 Aug 2016, at 18:14, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter = <juergen.gotteswinter@internetx.com> wrote: >>=20 >> LSI SAS 2008 Based HBA, there are dozens of OEM available for Budget = Prices >> With the IT firmware. >>=20 >> Am 22.08.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Dmitry Morozovsky: >>> Dear colleagues, >>>=20 >>> what is the list of preferred disk controllers to build storage = server, say >>> 12-24 amd more 3.5" disks? Not too much IOPS are expected, and some = could be >>> mitigated with L2ARC with only metadata cached, I suppose. >>>=20 >>> Two usage schemes are file server for big files (mostly cold = storage) and >>> backup/surveillance server (constant stream writes, occasional = random reads) >>>=20 >>> Any hints? Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70B75F18-056B-49E5-9CDE-E8CCEA405CE8>