Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:27:14 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        "Ezequiel O. Block" <ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: multihomed gateway
Message-ID:  <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> (Ezequiel O. Block's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300")
References:  <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote:
> > 
> >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with
> >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range
> >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default
> >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD
> >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have
> >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have
> >>had this issue before? any clue?
> > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs.

> mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address,
> such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you
> think ipfw would be useful in this case?

Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from internet while forwarding
takes place at sending packets. Seems that proxyarp is not an issue
here.


WBR
-- 
bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72895789>