Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:33:21 +0200 From: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warren Block schreef op : > The difference is that a local svn checkout has all the commit > history. A comparison recently showed 700-some megabytes more space > used by the svn checkout. > Although I believe the checkouts are bigger, I do not think they have all the commit history. This is where SVN and CVS differ from systems like Git or Mercury, which have all the history in a local working copy. I think the overhead of SVN consists of backups and cached copies of the previous revision, but I am not quite sure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5>