Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:30:01 +0200
From:      Andrew Stevenson <andrew@ugh.net.au>
To:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Willem@offermans.rompen.nl, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: bf_next not NULL!
Message-ID:  <762054A0-B628-4CD8-9F59-6B52CEB78481@ugh.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <A0ED3F72-21EF-4B97-BF4B-AA0AEA336958@ugh.net.au>
References:  <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> <CAJ-VmomwtRwk8aNcCn3pKzbLspPHN0UKPC4J%2BdS0ebOvHom73g@mail.gmail.com> <A0ED3F72-21EF-4B97-BF4B-AA0AEA336958@ugh.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Well after a week of running 11 (BETA1 r303134) I think sadly its worse =
than 10. No more bf_next errors. Still lots of "ath0: stuck beacon; =
resetting (bmiss count 4)=94. The main thing though is the the clients =
drop of the network and can=92t reattach.

Sometimes restarting hostapd is all that is needed, though occasionally =
I have to =93restart" the interface (/etc/rc.d/netif restart wlan0).

Happens usually once or twice a day. Is there anything I can do to help =
debug? I tried to attach to hostapd with gdb last time but gdb had an =
internal error and killed the process.

Thanks,

Andrew=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?762054A0-B628-4CD8-9F59-6B52CEB78481>