Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:16:36 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay Message-ID: <785092730.20050329231636@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <f437208e618414fda808bef45da84392@chrononomicon.com> References: <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEPAFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <1648629793.20050329122346@wanadoo.fr> <42496060.1060404@makeworld.com> <467487023.20050329162852@wanadoo.fr> <42496992.7020800@makeworld.com> <1805326777.20050329181237@wanadoo.fr> <42498D19.60209@makeworld.com> <813611053.20050329205032@wanadoo.fr> <f437208e618414fda808bef45da84392@chrononomicon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bart Silverstrim writes: > If it doesn't say, the list is referring to the generic > off-the-f'ing-shelf version. I _have_ the generic, off-the-shelf version of this PC. > Very good. And if you take one of them whining about a problem, they > point at the list and say, "Tough Sh*t." No, they don't. They point out that they can't support your configuration. Sometimes they offer suggestions, anyway, sometimes they don't. They just aren't _obligated_ to provide any support. > Yes, that's exactly what he's saying when properly twisted. Even without twisting, that seemed to be the clear meaning. > If "superior design" consists solely of ignoring problems > or ignoring glitches in hardware, then you have a real gem. No, I was referring to the additional modularity and stability made possible by the additional abstraction of a HAL. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?785092730.20050329231636>