Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:30 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Standard type for code pointers? Message-ID: <84dead720504200910441b9108@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050420155407.GA844@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> References: <84dead720504200541539f4c15@mail.gmail.com> <03f22a3c76ac440b97e2179761dfd6fa@xcllnt.net> <20050420155407.GA844@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Except that intptr_t need only be large enough to hold an=20 > object pointer. This is not necessarily enough to hold a=20 > function pointer. Right. > The only standard types that are guaranteed to be able to hold > a function pointer are other function pointers. Right, but there doesn't seem to be a C99 name for function pointer types. Is 'register_t' guaranteed to be wide enough? --=20 FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84dead720504200910441b9108>