Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:39:23 -0400 From: "David Yeske" <dyeske@gmail.com> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: EM MFC and 6.2 RELEASE Message-ID: <85bdae4e0710111039h23aa2113wefbdcbadeced9700@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710111020w460125d6sf28563d57266cc3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0710111020w460125d6sf28563d57266cc3e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put > into STABLE on 6.2 RELEASE. > > Right now it won't compile, this is because I put the MSI/X support > in the clear, figuring 'well, this is STABLE so why should I #ifdef :)'. > > I should have known better, and of course the driver code that will > be in the Intel-published form DOES have the stuff #ifdef EM_MSI, > so it will compile on 6.2... > > I am considering a compromise but I don't know exactly how you > do it, what I will do is put in a #if __FreeBSD_version around the > couple of places that matter... so here is the question: what is > the numeric way of designating RELEASE vs STABLE?? > > I could also just do this as EM_MSI_SUPPORT and then define > that in the Makefiles, but this seemed like the simplest way. > > If someone can tell me how to do it I will check that change in > today... > > Cheers, > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It looks like 6.2-R is #define __FreeBSD_version 602000 and RELENG_6 as of today is #define __FreeBSD_version 602112
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85bdae4e0710111039h23aa2113wefbdcbadeced9700>