Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 08:29:18 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps segfaults since I overclocked. and worries. Message-ID: <8619.892222158@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Apr 1998 16:11:32 BST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980410155959.7097A-100000@dylan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'll shut up now, but if FreeBSD isn't going to be supporting hardware > that will be becoming standard soon then I'm slightly worried, I'd have > thought current- was the testing ground for stuff such as this Certainly, though clocking pre-standard hardware up to the standard and testing that would only constitute poor testing methodology. Before becoming even slightly worried, I'd first want to see test failures on hardware where all components are rated for the conditions of the test. Considering the number of manufacturers involved just in getting all the components on a motherboard to work properly together at some target clock speed, it's often surprising to consider that the whole mess works at all. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8619.892222158>