Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:56:04 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-version(1) enchancement Message-ID: <861u2mj64r.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B7WWSeoYpJra8MD=gaCgPnLvLOFhbQ%2BzjRDaJOi1q6sfdPT9g@mail.gmail.com> (Kimmo Paasiala's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:16:26 %2B0200") References: <CA%2B7WWSeoYpJra8MD=gaCgPnLvLOFhbQ%2BzjRDaJOi1q6sfdPT9g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> writes: > Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system > sources in the version output? No. It is not available in the most important use case for freebsd-version(1), i.e. freebsd-update builds. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861u2mj64r.fsf>