Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:55:57 +0900 From: Tatsumi Hosokawa <hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp> To: mobile@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pccard_ether does not work without DHCP Message-ID: <863drzt2xe.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:49:17 %2B0900" <864scft38i.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> References: <867lhbt4rg.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <864scft38i.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:49:17 +0900, Tatsumi Hosokawa <hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp> wrote: > "at isa?" or explicit ioaddr and irq specification causes this > problem? > > Please test it with fe0 card if you have fe0 card. fe0 in GENERIC is > device fe0 at isa? port 0x300 irq ? I tested it with sio card and kernel says that devclass_alloc_unit: sio2 already exists, using next available unit number and used sio4. Of course, sio's in kernel are device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 device sio2 at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 device sio3 at isa? disable port IO_COM4 irq 9 so, I think fe0 causes same problem. Applying s/ed0/ed1/, s/fe0/fe1/, s/sio2/sio4/,... to /etc/pccard.conf.sample would be an effective hack, but it's dirty hack. Any better ideas? -- --------------------------- Tatsumi Hosokawa hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863drzt2xe.wl>