Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:34:09 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: bert wiley <bertwiley@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need some help understanding a jail system call. Message-ID: <868wh663vi.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <9527461a0908260656w570f6cdha72e92b267e5354f@mail.gmail.com> (bert wiley's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:56:50 -0400") References: <9527461a0908260656w570f6cdha72e92b267e5354f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bert wiley <bertwiley@gmail.com> writes: > No where in the code do i ever see any access to the jail.h type systems > calls Because at that stage in the development process, the system calls in <sys/jail.h> belong to the old implementation. > so does the syscall(375, JAIL_CREATE, argv[1]); actually access the > jail subsystem and create a jail? It calls the new system call, which at that stage hasn't been added to libc yet, because it would conflict with the existing system calls. > Here is the link i used to find this code > http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/jailng/ You realize that this is eight years old, right? And that the jail infrastructure has been extensively modified since then, and is currently being rewritten again? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868wh663vi.fsf>