Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:13:39 -0500 From: Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports upgrade .... Message-ID: <86d1pl2w7g.fsf@WorkBox.Home> In-Reply-To: <44oa95crg1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <571684CD.2070800@hiwaay.net> <44oa95crg1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lowell Gilbert writes: > "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> writes: > >> It brought down almost 14K updates for 3-ish weeks .... I know the >> ports effort is a feverish hive of productivity, but that sounded a >> bit high :-) .... Is that number anomalous, maybe coincident w/ new >> quarter, something else ? More question than problem, but curious. TIA >> & have a good one. > > If you're switching from one quarterly branch to the next, then sure, > you've pretty much got three months worth of updates at once. I thought portsnap couldn't fetch from the quarterly branches? Or did my caffeine-starved brain just misread something? :P -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ----------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86d1pl2w7g.fsf>