Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:27:11 +0530 From: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> Cc: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA), ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.01 Message-ID: <86io0yzsfs.fsf@chateau.d.if> References: <86h9gs26l0.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160228193353.0b62c06b@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <864mcs1g9p.fsf@chateau.d.if> <CEC1F737-32E1-478D-A3AB-3473BF14B28F@alkumuna.eu> <86d1rfehpi.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160305180935.1eff68ff@freedom.alkumuna.eu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 18:09:35 +0100, Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> said: [...] Hi, | Ok, back on business! | My issue with the non-applied patchs is that those were not creates in the files subdir in ejabberd, but in a ejabberd/files subdir. That is likely due to the missing/incorrect, use of 'patch -pN'. I remember testing successful diff application before posting on the list, except for a 404-ing URL in one of my diffs. | Regarding the pam module installation, it seems to be installed in : | /usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/ejabberd-16.01/lib/p1_pam-1.0.0/priv/bin/epam | But ejabberd at start will fail with : | 2016-03-05 17:52:49.297 [error] <0.394.0> Can't open file | "/usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/ejabberd-16.01/lib/erlang/lib/ejabberd-16.01/priv/bin/epam": enoent | So I guess it's not installed in the right place? I guess, although I don't see in the sources, where exactly it refer to this path, or even install the module. I'll check and get back to you. | Then, regarding the bash issue, I made some progress, but I still need | to test it a bit more to be sure it do not introduce new bugs (it's | not much, but I have to see if the kinda simple shell escaping | function equivalent I put is enough). These bash script changes could you contribute to upstream instead. I don't really wish to keep maintaining them downstream. ejabberd team has released 16.02 in the meantime, I'll work on updating to it instead. It works fine in my testing so far except for the PAM issue you've mentioned. I'll post updated patch here for testing. Thanks! -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 “If I were to compare a human's heart with the ocean, the ocean would be stagnant.” (Recruit, Arakawa Under the Bridge) Sent from my Emacs [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW3SZIAAoJEMdGz6nnT6SwsxwP/ihP2MqSMNK8ABkbDYVMzPyS ed7fSNDXr3B6EoZhjjpGyIi2tsET2lBACDBethmznLBGahP7HKAd8+nyD7cUzOvv 8D7rls+3I7APYXMxY3PO9kIBaCvAAaj6FF+2iDoK272MthIATHqRdHyPYF0k4LJ4 2+sc3N6CnfGCt6EXfQrdIcs52LDHmOhDmgpEHYm7ik2dbW7RJAs7IqVrh0qUQ9Jb F4JKbojSs36lNGHZay2eqAyjaK1colWEnTsIxaklTFvSjUjjrRX5Reu8urhF2r98 mcTi8XC3o5fmvjncYALE+Z5C+lfis4DXpY0oG2KvPy/NEbgdV3xfvLRIJylKKSO2 MPxNPdcKjgGHTNRwcCMGUcY5NRfR93NihH2McoJxSgwtAc7eu9b988h4s+FYARM6 Rmc7stGxsS+xIXJqgNyiaHn4lGOCqhDi4qJTRslIPqYi+MylahyXYbCNya7b0xH8 nq6LEbOynmg/vT06yXeUcOc9qp5/MFHNgW002uX95vYo2RDJmOJdxU4CRm1XTEvE b0uVEdwS8lvskcA+CRutDhvXZOobUyF3hyOD01wWT7t6+23YD/wuif1lPzZQgwWA HHAOiA52yZSMMcNModRVfH9tmxbwoAPCQxIt+7yuJridd9dbfXrteRElobAMjFvy jfMk0Iw+R41idNWr9BLA =Nlni -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86io0yzsfs.fsf>