Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:12:07 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future Message-ID: <86lj55g73s.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <20101106225708.GD67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> (Chip Camden's message of "Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:57:08 -0700") References: <AANLkTi=EKpVrX2xc7oq%2Bp=RCVtUMUmcVYefj7G20yr-O@mail.gmail.com> <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTin60PyaapfjTQP1G97kOx3b3P-mb6Ffw-A0nL3E@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimYpRZUMAAnxJk2vtoUeOor%2BB8Skg7%2BH3%2BRj4wt@mail.gmail.com> <20101106203634.GD13095@guilt.hydra> <20101106225708.GD67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Chip" == Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com> writes: Chip> The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a Chip> truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere Chip> that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle. When I interviewed the VirtualBox guys for FLOSS Weekly (http://twit.tv/floss130), they seemed pretty confident that Oracle was going to keep fairly "hands off", in a way that was starkly contrasted with some of the other former-Sun project leaders I've spoken to. (Ugh, too early to fix the tortured english... I hope you get the point.) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86lj55g73s.fsf>