Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:46:45 +0200
From:      des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kernel killing processes when out of swap
Message-ID:  <86ll7ox7re.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <011a01c53f66$4035aa00$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <200504121224.j3CCOFXL019177@marlena.vvi.at> <011a01c53f66$4035aa00$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> writes:
> Thanks for the feedback seems very strange that sshd was the first thing =
the
> kernel killed off; so unless it was actually at fault ( would be very str=
ange )
> it would have been one of the smallest not largest processes.
> The box has runs several 200M+ process and more 100M+ where
> as sshd is usually 6M.
>
> So this leads me to the questions:
> 1. Any know issues ssh which could make it eat memory?
> 2. Is there possibly a bug with the "large process detection"?

There is no "large process detection".  The first process that tries
to fault in a new page after the system runs out of swap gets killed.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ll7ox7re.fsf>